Manual Code Review, by People Who Understand Attacks
Secure Code Review Services
Automated scanners catch the obvious issues, but real vulnerabilities often hide in business logic and edge cases scanners cannot see. Our secure code reviews combine manual analysis with automated tooling to give you a clear, honest picture of your codebase's security.
- Certified Experts
- OSCP, CEH, CRTP & industry-certified testers.
- Real-World Approach
- Manual testing with real-world attack techniques.
- Actionable Reporting
- Detailed findings with clear risk ratings and remediation.
- Confidential & Secure
- Strict NDA, data protection & privacy practices.
// Code Review
A Second Set of Eyes That Knows What to Look For
Every developer writes code with certain assumptions in mind, and those assumptions are exactly where vulnerabilities hide. Our reviewers approach your codebase the way an attacker would, looking for logic flaws, access control gaps and insecure dependencies that automated tools routinely miss.
The written report also serves as documented evidence of your secure development process, which is what ISO 27001 and Cyber Essentials assessors ask to see.
- Vulnerabilities Identified before They Reach Production
- Clear, Prioritised Remediation Guidance
- Reduced Risk of Logic and Access Control Flaws
- Evidence for Compliance and Audit Requirements
// Coverage
What Our Code Review Service Includes
Authentication and Access Control Logic
Manual review of the code paths that decide who can do what.
Static Analysis across the Codebase
Automated coverage so nothing is missed at scale.
Dependency and Library Review
Third-party packages checked for known vulnerabilities and risky configuration.
Secrets and Credential Exposure
Checks for keys, tokens and passwords committed into the repository.
Prioritised Remediation Report
Findings ranked by real risk, each with a clear fix.
Follow-Up Verification Review
A second look to confirm your fixes actually closed the gap.
// Methodology
How We Review Your Code
- 01
Scoping
We agree which repositories and code paths matter most.
- 02
Static Analysis
Automated tooling run across the full codebase for breadth.
- 03
Manual Review
Reviewers work through critical logic the way an attacker would.
- 04
Reporting
Findings prioritised by real-world risk with clear remediation steps.
- 05
Follow-Up Review
We re-review the fixed code to confirm the issues are genuinely closed.
// Ready when you are
Put your secure code review services to the test.
// Impact
Why Secure Code Reviews Matter
Scanners Miss Logic Flaws
Automated tools typically miss business logic and access control problems.
// Our Review Approach
- Manual review of critical code paths and business logic
- Automated static analysis to cover the codebase at scale
- Prioritised findings ranked by real-world risk
What you get
// Tools We Use
// Why Pluto Cyber Security
Reviewed by People Who Also Break Applications
Our reviewers do not just check syntax and style. Many hold offensive security certifications and bring real penetration testing experience to every review, so they know exactly what an attacker looks for.
Manual and Automated
A combined approach that catches more than either alone.
Certified Reviewers
OSCP and GIAC certified professionals on every engagement.
Actionable Reports
Findings ranked by risk, with clear fixes, not just a list of issues.
Language Coverage
Reviews across JavaScript, Python, .NET, Java and more.
A code review examines the source code directly, catching flaws in logic and design, while a penetration test attacks the running application from the outside. We recommend both for full coverage.
// Related services
Explore Related Services.
Get started
Ready to Scope Your Secure Code Review Services?
Tell us what you need tested. We reply with honest guidance and a fixed-scope quote, usually within one business day.